Sunday, March 18, 2012

The Affordable Care Act, Part II

Untitled Document
NYT: 5 Obamacare myths (July 2012)

1. Myth: It's a jobkiller
2. Myth: it's a fed takeover of health insurance
3. Myth: the unfettered marketplace is a better solution
4. Myth: leave it to the states; they'll fix it
5. Myth: it's loser: run against it, run from it; don't run on it

Issues of Cost and the Affordable Care Act
(lots of other stuff, at this post)
Why we need "Obamacare":
http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/06/what-the-wapo-wont-run.html

TOP | _______________________
Cost/Affordable Care Act
TWO GREAT VIDEOS to remind you about what is at stake with Health Care Reform -- recommended viewing!

More info after the flip...
Tne Doctor Shortage
TOP | ______________________
After The Supreme Court Decsion
TOP | _______________________
"Obamacare" Now
TOP | _______________________
"We have the best health care in the world"
|TOP|_______________________
 Why does Health Care Cost So Much?
Essential reading/listening/watching:
TOP|_______________________
Selling Insurance Across State Lines: The Race to the Bottom
_______________________
TOP |
Without You I'm Nothing: The Individual Mandate is the part that makes it work
Medicare and "Obamacare"
Romney, Healthcare, Romneycare: 
Can we talk about Single Payer Yet?
For Medicare, with all its flaws, works better than private insurance. It has less bureaucracy and, hence, lower administrative costs than private insurers. It has been more successful in controlling costs. While Medicare expenses per beneficiary have soared over the past 40 years, they’ve risen significantly less than private insurance premiums. And since Medicare-type systems in other advanced countries have much lower costs than the uniquely privatized U.S. system, there’s good reason to believe that Medicare reform can do a lot to control costs in the future.
In that case, you may ask, why didn’t the 2010 health care reform simply extend Medicare to cover everyone? The answer, of course, is political realism. Most health reformers I know would have supported Medicare for all if they had considered it politically feasible. But given the power of the insurance lobby and the knee-jerk opposition of many politicians to any expansion of government, they settled for what they thought they could actually get: near-universal coverage through a system of regulation and subsidies.
It is, however, one thing to accept a second-best system insuring those who currently lack coverage. Throwing millions of Americans off Medicare and pushing them into the arms of private insurers is another story.
--Krugman, 2011

No comments:

Post a Comment

First names requested for commenters! Choose the "Name/URL" comment type on the menu (URL not required).

Comments are moderated and will not immediately appear. I may not approve comments that are negative in tone, nasty or unproductive, the final arbitration of which is dependent on me alone. : )

Anonymous pissy comments will not be approved, so don't bother. If you want to fight with me, do it on twitter. thanks!